🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.